
Compares Proof-of-Work across blockchains by converting hashrates into power consumption (watts), then calculating how many confirmations on each chain equal the same amount of work as 6 Bitcoin confirmations. How are these values calculated?
| Name | Market Cap | Hashrate | Power | Equivalent Confs | Estimated Time | Difference |
| $1.51 T | SHA-256 @ 1,074 EH/s | 14 GW | 6 confs | 54m 36s | - | |
| $17.24 B | Scrypt @ 2.42 PH/s | 507 MW | 1,487 confs | 1d 2h | 29x slower | |
| $9.80 B | Equihash @ 17 GH/s | 58 MW | 11,008 confs | 9d 10h | 249x slower | |
| $7.26 B | SHA-256 @ 5.04 EH/s | 68 MW | 1,222 confs | 8d 2h | 213x slower | |
| $7.04 B | RandomX @ 5.59 GH/s | 35 MW | 11,635 confs | 15d 14h | 412x slower | |
| $4.06 B | Scrypt @ 2.94 PH/s | 618 MW | 509 confs | 21h 20m | 23x slower | |
| $1.38 B | Etchash @ 196 TH/s | 401 MW | 8,753 confs | 1d 8h | 36x slower | |
| $543.41 M | X11 @ 2.18 PH/s | 3.50 MW | 85,911 confs | 157d 2h | 4,143x slower | |
| $87.76 M | KawPow @ 2.67 TH/s | 13 MW | 61,242 confs | 41d 19h | 1,103x slower | |
| $83.82 M | RandomX @ 76 MH/s | 481 KW | 1,672,192 confs | 3y 46d | 30,116x slower | |
| $68.58 M | Eaglesong @ 102 PH/s | 4.96 MW | 1,041,100 confs | 110d 22h | 2,926x slower | |
| $204,161 | RandomX @ 2.12 MH/s | 13 KW | 1,885,515 confs | 112y 321d | 1,086,646x slower | |
| $46,148 | KawPow @ 480 MH/s | 2.37 KW | 669,084,792 confs | 636y 181d | 6,127,150x slower |