
Compares Proof-of-Work across blockchains by converting hashrates into power consumption (watts), then calculating how many confirmations on each chain equal the same amount of work as 6 Bitcoin confirmations. How are these values calculated?
| Name | Market Cap | Hashrate | Power | Equivalent Confs | Estimated Time | Difference |
| $1.38 T | SHA-256 @ 1,107 EH/s | 14 GW | 6 confs | 53m 54s | - | |
| $15.75 B | Scrypt @ 4.06 PH/s | 852 MW | 887 confs | 15h 46m | 18x slower | |
| $8.61 B | SHA-256 @ 5.81 EH/s | 78 MW | 948 confs | 7d 3h | 191x slower | |
| $6.10 B | RandomX @ 5.19 GH/s | 32 MW | 12,118 confs | 17d 2h | 457x slower | |
| $4.17 B | Scrypt @ 2.93 PH/s | 616 MW | 557 confs | 21h 48m | 24x slower | |
| $4.09 B | Equihash @ 16 GH/s | 53 MW | 12,034 confs | 10d 10h | 279x slower | |
| $1.36 B | Etchash @ 196 TH/s | 401 MW | 8,897 confs | 1d 9h | 37x slower | |
| $388.96 M | X11 @ 2.90 PH/s | 4.65 MW | 66,589 confs | 120d 5h | 3,212x slower | |
| $119.60 M | RandomX @ 85 MH/s | 539 KW | 1,423,183 confs | 2y 307d | 27,724x slower | |
| $92.59 M | KawPow @ 2.71 TH/s | 13 MW | 60,323 confs | 41d 21h | 1,119x slower | |
| $69.29 M | Eaglesong @ 121 PH/s | 5.87 MW | 766,860 confs | 95d 7h | 2,546x slower | |
| $238,073 | RandomX @ 1.22 MH/s | 7.68 KW | 1,304,192 confs | 199y 212d | 1,946,205x slower | |
| $93,221 | KawPow @ 1.80 GH/s | 8.85 KW | 182,119,370 confs | 173y 90d | 1,689,419x slower |